Saturday, 25 January 2025

Odysee video platform

Odysee has been around since 2020 and has has really taken off as an alternative to YouTube. It is decentralized and uncensored, so during the covidhoax it had all the videos exposing the death jabs that YouTube was censoring.

It's a genuine free speech platform, with all sorts of interesting content, rather than a bunch of globalist approved mind programing and distractions. Many of the best content creators, who were censored by YouTube, are now posting all their podcasts on Odysee.

https://odysee.com/


Two of our most highly recommended resources are the websites of Dr Tom Cowan and Dr Sam Bailey.

 They both also have channels on Odysee with lots of great content.

https://odysee.com/@Dr.TomCowan:8?view=content

 

Friday, 24 January 2025

Why real food is better

"JUST Egg" is just about anything but egg. This disgusting collection of unnatural and processed vegan fake foods including canola oil (aka. rapeseed oil) and the ever present sugar, is another good example of why it's always best to stick with the real thing.


 


Monday, 20 January 2025

Eat ze bugs

A Swedish company called Tebrito had a plan to produce meal-worms for insect proteins to put in human food like granola and protein bars. They got $4.2 million in investments to push this toxic "food".


In 2023 they only had a revenue of $49000 and lost almost $12.6 million. In 2024 they went bankrupt because nobody wants to eat insects. At least most people are REJECTING this part of the globalist agenda. 
 
 

Another Swedish company called Mycorena also went bankrupt in 2024. They got $27.8 million in investments to produce 3D printed fake meat made out of mycelium.
It is clear that even in liberal Sweden, people do not want to eat fake foo
d.

Go woke, go broke.


 

Saturday, 18 January 2025

What we have learned

This is one of Dr Tom Cowan's best ever podcasts. It goes beyond his usual health related topics and exposes some of the other big scams.

 https://odysee.com/@Dr.TomCowan:8/8.14.24:e

After discussing the myth of oil being a "fossil fuel" he exposes the lie of "nuclear bombs"  including Bikini Atoll testing, and then gets in the massive scams of "government" and "disease" - Great stuff!
 


Friday, 3 January 2025

134 years of warnings

There is a 134 year history of books warning about the death jabs ("vaccines")

They actually go back further than that, but this is a pretty good list:

1889 Jenner & Vaccination. Charles Creighton, M.D.
1892 Vaccination Tracts Garth Wilkinson, M.D.
1892 Sanitation-Sanatory Remedies or Vaccination and the Drug Treatment. J. Pickering
1893 The Recrudescence of Leprosy William Teeb M.D.
1895 What about Vaccinations. Alford Mines M.A.
1896 A Century of Vaccination W. Scott Reeb M.D.
1898 Theory and Practice of Vaccination. R. Cory M.D.
1900 Vaccination the World’s Humbug George W. Lawbaugh
1900 Compulsory Vaccination J.M. Peebles M.D.
1901 Vaccination A Crime Felix Oswald M.D.
1902 The Vaccination Superstition J. W. Hodge M.D.
1902 Vaccination A Blunder in Poisons C.F. Nichols
1909 A Beautiful Arm A History of Vaccination Delusion Amos Booth (This man went to prison)
1912 Leicester-Sanitation versus Vaccination J. P. Biggs (Founder of the National Anti-Vaccination League)
1913 The History of Inoculation and Vaccination American Medical Association.
1923 timely Truths on Human Health Simon Katzoff M.D.
1924 A Physicians Manual of Vaccine Therapy G.H. Sherman
1924 Smallpox and Vaccination.
1926 The Crime of Vaccination. Benedict Lust M.D.
1928 Vaccines and Serum Herbert Shelton
1929 The Facts against Compulsory Vaccination. H.B. Anderson
1935 The Medical Voodoo Anne Riley Hale
1951 The Truth about Vaccination Lily Loat
1957 The Introduction of Vaccination B. Waterhouse
1958 Who is your Doctor and Why. Alonzo J. Shadman
1965 The Blood Poisoners Lionel Dole
1974 The Hidden Dangers in Polio Vaccines Eleanor McBean
1974 The Poison Needle E. Mcbean
1976 Don’t get Stuck Hanna Alan
1977 Vaccination The Silent Killer Ida Honorof
1981 Vaccination Condemned Ida Honorof
1984 How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of your Doctor R. Mendelsohn M.D.
1985 Vaccination and Immune Malfunction Harrold Buttram M.D.
1988 Immunization the Reality behind the Myth.
1990 The Immunization Decision R. Neustaedter
1990 Vaccination Social Violence and Criminality Harris Coulter
1991 Vaccinations do not Protect. E. McBean N.D.




Wednesday, 1 January 2025

Blogging in 2025

  BEST WISHES FOR THE NEW YEAR

We originally set up this new WAPF Wellington Chapter blog at the start of 2024 and planned to regularly add new content to it throughout the year.

But things didn't entirely go to plan, and apart from a lot of collections of WAPF related images and a bunch of fluoridation posts, it wasn't really a great years blogging. 

New Year is always a good time to start over again, and the plan for 2025 is to update and repost the best of the 2024 posts, delete any out of date content, and to post more WAPF related resources, recommendations, and research, along with any other interesting new content.

Blogging is not as popular as it was a decade or so ago, but we still think it's an excellent way to present information, and for anyone who likes to read, a much faster and more efficient way to learn than watching videos.  So we are aiming to go back to our roots and have an old fashioned blog.

 

 Nutrition and Physical Degeneration by Weston A Price is free to read online here

Nutrition and Physical Degeneration is available to read free online

Thanks to Gutenberg.net.au for sharing it

New Expanded 8th edition with new photos and text. An epic study demonstrating the importance of whole food nutrition, and the degeneration and destruction that comes from a diet of processed foods. 

For nearly 10 years, Weston Price and his wife traveled around the world in search of the secret to health. Instead of looking at people afflicted with disease symptoms, this highly-respected dentist and dental researcher chose to focus on healthy individuals, and challenged himself to understand how they achieved such amazing health. 

Dr. Price traveled to hundreds of cities in a total of 14 different countries in his search to find healthy people. He investigated some of the most remote areas in the world. He observed perfect dental arches, minimal tooth decay, high immunity to tuberculosis and overall excellent health in those groups of people who ate their indigenous foods. He found when these people were introduced to modernized foods, such as white flour, white sugar, refined vegetable oils and canned goods, signs of degeneration quickly became quite evident. Dental caries, deformed jaw structures, crooked teeth, arthritis and a low immunity to tuberculosis became rampant amongst them. 

Dr. Price documented this ancestral wisdom including hundreds of photos in his book, Nutrition and Physical Degeneration. 

Nutrition and Physical Degeneration - free online copy


Objectives of the Weston A Price Foundation

To restore nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research, and activism.

To support organic farming, community-supported farms, honest and informative labeling, prepared parenting and nurturing therapies

To establish a laboratory to test the nutrient content of foods

To harness modern technology as a servant to the nurturing traditions of our ancestors, rather than as a force destructive to the environment and human health, and to scientifically demonstrate the value of those traditions.

To publish a quarterly journal, "Wise Traditions in Food, Farming, and the Healing Arts", dedicated to exploring the scientific validation of dietary, agricultural and medical traditions throughout the world

To advocate the legalistion of the sale of clean certified raw milk

To alert the public to the dangers of soy products, trans fats, "low fat" diets, aspartame, fluoridation, and other government approved toxins

For a full overview of all the areas the foundation covers, their website is a great place to start

To restore nutrient-dense foods to the human diet through education, research and activism.

To support organic farming, community-supported farms, honest and informative labeling, prepared parenting and nurturing therapies

To establish a laboratory to test the nutrient content of foods

To harness modern technology as a servant to the nurturing traditions of our ancestors, rather than as a force destructive to the environment and human health, and to scientifically demonstrate the value of those traditions.

To publish a quarterly journal, "Wise Traditions in Food, Farming, and the Healing Arts", dedicated to exploring the scientific validation of dietary, agricultural and medical traditions throughout the world

To advocate the legalistion of the sale of clean certified raw milk

To alert the public to the dangers of soy products, trans fats, "low fat" diets, aspartame, fluoridation, and other government approved toxins

For a full overview of all the areas the foundation covers, their website is a great place to start.





Wednesday, 31 July 2024

Fluoride: A Toxic Waste Product

Today is the last day of July, fluoride awareness month - we have compiled all 31 of our daily posts for the month here: 

https://wapfwellington.blogspot.com/.../fluoride-aware...


This is not  going to be the end of exposing the scandal of poisoning NZ ratepayers with a neorotoxin - let's keep this fight going, it is just as lethal as the "vaccinations" our corrupt health systems are poisoning children with.

  ·
☠️ Fluoride: A Toxic Waste Product ☠️

 
Hydrofluorosilcic acid is a byproduct of the phosphate fertilizer industry. Why are we allowing this hazardous waste in our drinking water? It's time to demand an end to this abomination.


📢 Get Involved:  Follow our Facebook pages:

 https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064287175469

 https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61561786023353



https://fluoridefree.org.nz/who-would-have-believed.../...

 

Tuesday, 30 July 2024

Bone pain, joint pain, arthritis or fluoride poisoning?

Most people don’t realise that 50% of fluoride ingested is stored in the bones and soft tissue. Accumulation of fluoride can cause a disease called skeletal fluorosis. The first symptoms of skeletal fluorosis are identical to osteoarthritis.


 
“Long-term accumulative exposures to fluoride even at low levels carries a risk of sub-clinical or stage-1 musculo-skeletal fluorosis presenting as joint pain or arthritis. Notably, arthritis is a leading cause of disability with 647,000 now affected in this country and annual costs exceeding $3 billion.” Dr Mike Godfrey, Journal New Zealand Medical Association.


It is completely unknown how many people in New Zealand are suffering from skeletal fluorosis, rather than arthritis, because doctors are not aware this could happen here so testing is never done. 


What we do know is that the U.S. Government’s Institute of Medicine, Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride.(1997), have estimated “The development of skeletal fluorosis and its severity is directly related to the level and duration of exposure. Most epidemiological research has indicated that an intake of at least 10 mg/day for 10 or more years is needed to produce clinical signs of the milder forms of the condition”.


In 2013, the Hamilton City Council held a Tribunal Hearing on Fluoridation. One of the expert speakers promoting fluoridation was former chief oral health advisor, and now Medical Director for Health New Zealand, Dr Robin Whyman.


Dr Whyman explained to the councillors “You then swallow the fluoride and it comes down into the blood supply. Some of it is actually moves across to bone, we don’t disagree with that at all, and some of it will go to soft tissue.” But rather than stopping there and discussing what this means for bone health, and the health of our entire bodies, Dr Whyman, a dentist, moved on to talk about dental health.


Because fluoride accumulates, less exposure over longer periods can achieve the same result as high exposure over a shorter period. The intake established by the Institute of Medicine, 10 mg a day for 10 years, may be roughly the same as 5mg a day for 20 years or 2.5 mg a day for 40 years and so on. The Institute of Medicine say “Stage 1 skeletal fluorosis is characterized by occasional stiffness or pain in joints and some osteosclerosis of the pelvis and vertebra.” 


Could your bone or joint pain be caused by fluoride accumulating in your bones? Try avoiding all forms of fluoride. See Sources of Fluoride and New Zealand study on Fluoride and Tea.


“If I was an arthritic individual, I would be eliminating every source of fluoride exposure I could think of”. Phyllis Mullinex, PhD. 


Watch short video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwLAcR85iG4

https://fluoridefree.org.nz/bone-pain-joint-pain.../

 


 

Monday, 29 July 2024

Fluoridation is not about children’s teeth

Fluoridation is not about “children’s teeth,” it is about industry getting rid of its hazardous waste at a profit, instead of having to pay a fortune to dispose of it.


Only calcium fluoride occurs naturally in water; however, that type of fluoride has never been used for fluoridation. Instead what is used over 90 percent of the time are silicofluorides, which are 85 times more toxic than calcium fluoride.They are non-biodegradable, hazardous waste products that come straight from the pollution scrubbers of big industries. 

If not dumped in the public water supplies, these silicofluorides would have to be neutralized at the highest rated hazardous waste facility at a cost of $1.40 per gallon (or more depending on how much cadmium, lead, uranium and arsenic are also present). Cities buy these unrefined pollutants and dump them–lead, arsenic and all–into our water systems. Silicofluorides are almost as toxic as arsenic, and more toxic than lead.1, 2


The EPA has recently said it is vitally important that we lower the level of both lead and arsenic in our water supplies, and their official goal is zero parts per million. This being the case, why would anyone recommend adding silicofluorides, which contain both of these heavy metals?3


On July 2, 1997, EPA scientist, J. William Hirzy, PhD, stated, “Our members’ review of the body of evidence over the last eleven years, including animal and human epidemiology studies, indicate a causal link between fluoride/fluoridation and cancer, genetic damage, neurological impairment and bone pathology. Of particular concern are recent epidemiology studies linking fluoride exposure to lowered IQ in children.”4


The largest study of tooth decay in America (by the National Institute of Dental Research in 1987) proved that there was no significant difference in the decay rates of 39,000 fluoridated, partially fluoridated and non-fluoridated children, ages 5 to 17, surveyed in 84 cities. The media has never disclosed these facts. The study cost us, the taxpayers, $3,670,000. Surely, we are entitled to hear the results.5


Newburgh and Kingston, both in the state of New York, were two of the original fluoridation test cities. A recent study by the New York State Department of Health showed that after 50 years of fluoridation, Newburgh’s children have a slightly higher number of cavities than never-fluoridated Kingston.5


The recent California fluoridation study, sponsored by the Dental Health Foundation, showed that California has only about one quarter as much water fluoridation as the nation as a whole, yet 15-year-old California children have less tooth decay than the national average.6
From the day the Public Health Service completed their original 10-year Newburgh and Kingston fluoridation experiment, fluoride promoters have repeatedly claimed that fluoride added to drinking water can reduce tooth decay by as much as 60 to 70 percent.


Adding fluoride to the water has never prevented tooth decay, it merely delays it, by provoking a genetic malfunction that causes teeth to erupt later than normal. This delay makes it possible to read the statistics incorrectly without lying. Proponents count teeth that have not yet erupted as “no decay.” Therefore, they claimed that the fluoridated Newburgh children age 6 had 100 percent less tooth decay; by age 7, 100 percent less; by age 8, 67 percent less; age 9, 50 percent less; and by age 10, 40 percent less.


Obviously, the only reduction that really counted was the 40 percent by age 10, but the Public Health Service totaled the five reductions shown, then divided by 5 to obtain what they called “an over-all reduction of 70 percent.”


Had the Health Department continued their survey beyond age 10, they would have found that the percentage of reduction continued down hill to 30, 20, 0, and eventually the children drinking fluoridated water had more cavities–not less. The rate of decay is identical, once the children’s teeth erupt. In other words, this “65 percent less dental decay” is just a statistical illusion. It never happened!7


EPA scientists recently concluded, after studying all the evidence, that the public water supply should not be used “as a vehicle for disseminating this toxic and prophylatically useless. . . substance.” They felt there should be “an immediate halt to the use of the nation’s drinking water reservoirs as disposal sites for the toxic waste of the phosphate fertilizer industry.” Unfortunately, the management of the EPA sides not with their own scientists, but with industry on this issue.8


There is less tooth decay in the nation as a whole today than there used to be, but decay rates have also dropped in the non-fluoridated areas of the United States and in Europe where fluoridation of water is rare. The Pasteur Institute and the Nobel Institute have already caused fluoride to be banned in their countries (France and Sweden). In fact, most developed countries have banned, stopped or rejected fluoridation.9


Several recent studies, here and abroad, show that fluoridation is correlated with higher rather than lower rates of caries. There has been no study that shows any cost-saving by fluoridation. This claim has been researched by a Rand corporation study and found to be “simply not warranted by available evidence.”10In fact, dentists make 17 percent more profit in fluoridated areas as opposed to non-fluoridated areas.11 There are no savings.


Meanwhile, the incidence of dental fluorosis has skyrocketed. It is not just a “cosmetic effect.” Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary says: “Fluorosis is poisoning by fluorides.” Today, in North America, there is an increased prevalence of dental fluorosis, ranging from about 15 percent to 65 percent in fluoridated areas and 5 percent to 40 percent in non-fluoridated areas.12 African-American children experience twice the rate of dental fluorosis as white children and it tends to be more severe.13 The widespread and uncontrolled use of fluoride in our water, dental products, foods and beverages (grown and processed in fluoridated communities) is causing pervasive over-exposure to fluoride in the U.S. population.
 

A 1995 American Dental Association (ADA) chart shows that a certain fluoride drug should not be given to children under six months of age. It also shows that if fluoride is put into water, all children under six years of age will be getting an overdose.14


The FDA states that fluoride is a prescription drug, not a mineral nutrient. Who has the right to put a prescription drug in the water supply where there can be no control of dosage? People who drink a lot of water, like diabetics and athletes, will be overdosed, and studies have proven that 1 percent of the people are allergic to fluoridated water. Today, an unusual number of children in non-fluoridated areas are developing dental fluorosis!


Even if fluoride were good for teeth, shouldn’t the water be as safe as possible for everyone? Why should those who are against it be forced to drink it? What has happened to “Freedom of Choice?” We all know that fluoride is not “just one of forty chemicals used to treat water,” it is the only chemical added to treat the people! It is compulsory medication, which is unconstitutional. There are other alternatives that do not infringe on the rights of all consumers to choose their own form of medication.16


When the people have been given a chance to vote on this issue, more often than not, they have voted “no.” In the majority of cases, nationwide, it is the local city council that has forced it on the people. Fluoride promoters find it much easier to convince a few city council members than the general public. Here in America, we shouldn’t have to fight to keep a hazardous waste out of our water supply!


Bottom line: There are no benefits to fluoridation. We actually pay the phosphate fertilizer industries for their crude hazardous waste. Fluoridation contributes to many health problems and hither dental bills, and causes more (not less) suffering. Only big business wins with fluoridation–not our children (or us).


On Nov. 24, 1992, Robert Carton, PhD, a former EPA scientist, made this statement: Fluoridation is the greatest case of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time. Impossible? No, it’s not–look at how many years millions of people were fooled by the tobacco industries!

References


    George Glasser, Journalist, St. Petersburg, FL, “Fluoridation: A Mandate to Dump Toxic Waste in the Name of Public Health,” July 22, 1991.
    R.E. Gosselin et al, Clinical Toxicology of commercial Products, 5th ed., 1984. U.S. EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) EPA/NSF Standard 60.
    San Diego Union Tribune, May 25, 2000, “EPA proposes stricter rules for arsenic levels in water supplies,” and Associated Press, Jan. 17, 2001, “EPA Orders Sharp Reduction in Arsenic Levels in Drinking Water,” by H. Josef Hebert.
    Letter of July 2, 1997, from J. William Hirzy, Ph.D. to Jeff Green. The union (now NTEU, Chapter 280) consists of and represents all of the toxicologists, chemists, biologists and other professionals at EPA headquarters, Washington, D.C.
    “New studies cast doubt on fluoridation benefits,” by Bette Hileman, Chemical & Engineering News,Vol. 67, No. 19, May 8, 1989. “Recommendations for Fluoride Use in Children,” Jayanth V. Kumar, D.D.S., M.P.H.; Elmer L. Green, D.D.S., M.P.H., Pediatric Dentistry, Feb. 1998.
    San Diego Union Tribune, Sept. 1, 1999.
    Konstatin K. Paluev, Research and Development Engineer, “Fluoridation Benefits–Statistical Illusion,” testimony before the New York City Board of Estimate, Mar. 6, 1957.
    J. William Hirzy, EPA Union Vice-President, “Why EPA’s Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation,” May 1, 1999.
    Mark Diesendorf, “The mystery of declining tooth decay,” Nature, July 10, 1986, pp. 125-29.
    “The Truth About Mandatory Fluoridation,” John R. Lee, M.D. Apr. 15, 1995.
    The Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 84, Feb. 1972.
    K.E. Heller, et al, Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Vol. 57: No. 3 Summer 1997.
    National Research Council, “Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride,” 1993, p. 44.
    Pediatrics, May 1998, Vol. 95, Number 5.
    Food and Drug Administration letter dated Aug. 15, 1963.
    Abbot Laboratories, Scientific Divisions, North Chicago, IL, June 18, 1963.


https://www.westonaprice.org/.../fluoridation-the.../...



Sunday, 28 July 2024

The Absurdities of Fluoridation

 

1. Promoters say fluoride works on the outside of the teeth but then say everyone must have it in their drinking water.


2. Even though fluoridation chemicals are added to the water supply for a claimed therapeutic purpose, they are exempt from the Medicines Act. Fluoride pills, fluoride toothpaste and fluoride mouthwashes are not exempt.


3.Fluoridation chemicals are too toxic to be allowed to be released into the air so are captured in the smokestacks of the phosphate fertiliser industry. This highly toxic substance cannot be disposed of in streams, rivers or the sea but can be added to the public water supply with the claim that it reduces dental decay, so ultimately ends up in streams, rivers and the sea anyway (except what is retained in people’s bones and soft tissue).

 
4.All medications have an established safe dosage (i.e. mg per kilo per day) and are prescribed accordingly. But this isn't the case for the highly toxic fluoridation chemicals. Dose varies depending on how much water someone drinks regardless of age, weight, health status, dental health or even if they have teeth. 


5.Fluoridation forces bottle fed babies to consume 200 times more than they would have received through breast milk because the mother's body screens out just about all fluoride. It is logical to assume that there must be a good reason for this.


6. A tube of fluoride toothpaste comes with a warning not to swallow, yet the fluoridation chemicals are added to water for everyone to consume. 


7.Fluoride is added to water under the guise of reducing dental decay in some children yet everyone is forced to consume it with the claim that it may help someone else’s teeth.


8. Fluoridation allows the Government to do to everyone what a doctor cannot do to an individual patient – prescribe medication without informed consent. 


9. We are told the dose is too small to cause harm to anyone but large enough to be of benefit to everyone.



Saturday, 27 July 2024

The Case Against Fluoride

The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics that Keep it There

By Paul Connett, PhD, James Beck, MD, PhD, & H.S. Micklem, DPhil
Chelsea Green Publishing, 2010



On the label of every tube of fluoride toothpaste is a statement which reads, “Drug Facts: Active Ingredient—Sodium Fluoride … Keep out of reach of children under six years of age. If more than used for brushing is accidentally swallowed, get medical help or contact a Poison Control Center right away.” The amount recommended for brushing is about the size of a pea. This pea-sized dab contains about the same amount of fluoride as one glass of water in areas that fluoridate the water. Do you drink the recommended eight glasses of water per day? Do you call the Poison Control Center when you do?

The insanity of intentional water fluoridation is examined from every angle in this book. International law forbids dumping fluoride waste into the sea but it is accepted in American drinking water. As stated in the toothpaste disclaimer above, the FDA officially considers fluoride to be a drug. This drug has never been approved by the FDA. Contaminating drinking water with fluoride can be most charitably characterized as an experiment which violates the Nuremburg Code prohibiting experimental human treatment without informed consent. China, India, Japan and most of Europe do not fluoridate their water.


 One of the first studies claiming the safety of fluoride was done by Cox and Hodge. Cox worked for the giant aluminum company Alcoa. At that time fluoride was a major waste product of aluminum processing. It must have seemed like a wondrous miracle when Cox discovered that this toxic waste was safe and effective for preventing tooth decay when added to the water supply. The real miracle is that so many people apparently believe this. Hodge worked on the Manhattan Project supervising experiments on unsuspecting patients who were injected with uranium and plutonium. These guys have all the credibility of those famous leading scholars named Larry, Curly and Moe. If you believe the studies and health advice of Cox and Hodge, you might want to consider cutting back on eating those old lead-based paint chips.

Many other studies are reviewed, such as those of Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, who not only had no conflict of interest with the commercial entities involved but in fact suffered professionally for daring to suggest that fluoride might be problematic.

John Colquhoun of New Zealand promoted fluoride enthusiastically around the country for years. After traveling the world to survey the effects of fluoride, he realized he was quite wrong. Colquhoun was a man of rare courage and integrity, and spent the rest of his life trying to undo the damage he had done.


 When the National Research Council came out with a report—over five hundred pages long—unfavorable to fluoride, the American Dental Association took less than one day to dismiss it. The Centers for Disease Control rejected it six days later. The director of Quackwatch called fluoride opponents “poison-mongers.” The irony piles pretty high when you consider that most opponents are unpaid and do much of this on their own dime, they have nothing to monger or sell, and are trying to remove the poison, not add it.

Toward the end of the book the authors pull out one of my all-time favorite quotes from the late Michael Crichton. “Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled….The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. . . There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus.



This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly magazine of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Spring 2011.






Friday, 26 July 2024

Fluoride impairs brain development

Fluoride is lowering the IQ of all New Zealanders - that is the real reason it is being added to the water supply.

In May 2023, the U.S. Government’s National Toxicology Program (NTP) released a 6 year scientific review of fluoride and IQ. The Review contained a monograph and a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis found lower IQ with fluoride exposure, demonstrating remarkable consistency. Of the 19 studies rated higher quality, 18 found lowering of IQ.

The NTP authors said: “We have no basis on which to state that our findings are not relevant to some children or pregnant women in the United States” and that “Several of the highest quality studies showing lower IQs in children were done in fluoridated (0.7 mg/L) areas…many urinary fluoride measurements exceed those that would be expected from consuming water that contains fluoride at 1.5 mg/L.”

In New Zealand water is fluoridated at a higher level than in the U.S. and Canada. The maximum for fluoridation in those countries is 0.7 ppm (i.e. 0.7 mg/L). The New Zealand Ministry of Health recommends that water be fluoridated in a range between 0.7 and 1ppm. Most councils aim for the median of 0.85ppm but testing results from councils around the country has found that many of them are often fluoridating above 0.85ppm. This is a significant increase compared with the North American countries and therefore we can expect that the loss of IQ in New Zealand children is likely to be worse.

The evidence is growing stronger. Even since the NTP review was originally completed, there have been more U.S. Government funded studies published which have found harm to the developing brain.

The NTP goes on to say “Research on other neurotoxicants has shown that subtle shifts in IQ at the population level can have a profound impact on the number of people who fall within the high and low ranges of the population’s IQ distribution. For example a 5-point decrease in a population’s IQ would nearly double the number of people classified as intellectually disabled.

This means that every year in New Zealand thousands of babies have their brain development impaired directly as a result of fluoridation


Thursday, 25 July 2024

Fluoride turns men into eunuchs

Fluoride added to water makes circus animals calm and prisoners docile. Now we know the reason. A search for “fluoride” and “testosterone” turns up dozens of studies showing adverse effects, such as “Effects of sodium fluoride and sulfur dioxide on sperm motility and serum testosterone in male rats,” “Sodium fluoride disrupts testosterone biosynthesis by affecting the steroidogenic pathway in TM3 Leydig cells” and “Fluoride toxicity in the male reproductive system.” 

 

It’s mostly Chinese research­ers who are looking at this problem. A group from Shanxi, China, led by Jiahai Zhang investigated what happened to rats when given sodium fluoride in their drinking water (and also exposed to sulfur dioxide in the air) for eight consecu­tive weeks. Exposure to fluoride with sulfur dioxide but also to fluoride alone adversely affected testis tissue and serum testosterone levels in rats. 

Addition of fluoride—a toxic waste—to drinking water should be banned worldwide, but of course there is resistance, because then the industries pro­ducing it (such as the fertilizer industry) would have to engage in the expensive process of cleaning it up.


 

Wednesday, 24 July 2024

Fluoridation rests upon a blatant lie

In 2014 the Chief Science Advisor and the NZ Royal Society produced a Report on fluoridation. The conclusion on fluoride and IQ contains a blatant lie.

The Report claims the loss of 7 IQ points (described as “less than one standard deviation”) found in a 2012 Harvard review of human fluoride-IQ studies “is likely to be a measurement or statistical artefact of no functional significance.” This conclusion is a blatant lie. If the truthful conclusion had been reported, it would have said “is likely to be a measurement OF functional significance”, the whole trajectory of fluoridation in New Zealand would have been entirely different.


Everyone in New Zealand should be aware of this deception.


Watch video at 11 minutes in to see visual presentation of this lie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5WwNKP0WRI&t=655s
https://fluoridefree.org.nz/fluoridation-in-new-zealand.../