WAPF WELLINGTON: VACCINATIONS

VACCINATIONS –Potentially lethal and totally ineffective

“Belief in immunization is a form of delusional insanity”- Dr Herbert Shelton

Supporters of vaccinations believe that they are for the greater good; that parents who choose not to vaccinate are selfish, and a threat to other people’s children.

But for a public health policy to be for the greater good, the policy needs to be safe, effective, and the best way of achieving the aims

Many people argue about whether are really dangerous, but the risks are well proven.

What is less often discussed is whether they actually work – ie. do they reduce the spread of diseases? We say they don’t, and not a single properly designed study has ever been done that proves otherwise.

So why do pro vaccine interests claim the dangers are worth risking for “the greater good”? Their position seems indefensible. But there is a 4th thing to consider:

Follow the money

Vaccinations have a lot of money promoting them. They are also making a lot of money for many commercial interests, including the drug companies, the medical (sickness) industry, and the foundations who appear to be giving them away.

Vaccines are prescribed for everyone, not just sick people. It is a goldmine when you can sell something to the entire population. And there are lots of diseases out there.

Vaccinations are now even being prescribed for what were formerly considered as non-communicable conditions like cancers, diabetes, and obesity. It is possible to connect ANYTHING with an immune response and prescribe a vaccine for it.

This means that, in future, people may be told to take thousands over a lifetime. If vaccines are safe, then the manufacturers would be able to engage in proper debate and still convince the people. They wouldn’t need to indulge in character assassination or destroying the careers of scientists who report side effects.

It would be more ethical if vaccine companies paid compensation for injuries from their own funds, not taxpayers funds; if they were not given immunity from lawsuits; and they didn’t fill regulatory and legislative bodies with their cronies.

If vaccines were first given to top executives of the vaccines companies and the media advocates/politicians who prescribe them, they might not be so keen on promoting them.

Immunisation – Dr Toni Jeffreys (PhD)

To rational human beings, the ultimate test of both the safety and efficacy of would be: prolonged use over a period of time, with vigilant reporting of side effects.

But for some extraordinary reason, doctors are not routinely required to report either deaths following vaccination, complications following vaccination, or even if and when people contract the illness against which they have been vaccinated. And this has always been the way.

We are told that if we give a healthy human a tiny dose of something we are trying to avoid, then the body will make antibodies against it, and thus win out when the actual disease arrives in all its strength.

This is of course one of the principles of homeopathy as well. However, there is a big difference between the extremely dilute substances used in homeopathy, and the larger amounts of known biotoxins used in .

The following pieces of information will provide you with some surprising statistics and studies regarding failures of vaccines. It is important that parents and individuals are fully educated on the potential health risks before undergoing immunisation.

The Hidden Dangers of Infant Vaccination.

The most serious charge against the process of vaccination is that it is a risky business injecting foreign biological products into infants barely born and just getting their bearings in this world, just beginnining to develop that all important but tricky immune system. The U.S. Taskforce for Safer Childhood Vaccines went so far as to report that, safety is only relative and cannot be absolutely guaranteed.

When Japan stopped injecting infants with the DPT (Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus vaccine) and moved up the age of vaccination to two years, cot deaths (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome or SIDS) virtually disappeared in Japan. There was also a decline in spinal meningitis. Japan went on to have the lowest infant mortality rate in the world.

Sweden went on to have the second lowest infant mortality rate when the use of the pertussis vaccination was dropped in 1979. (Italy also does not use the DPT)

When the Australian government made DPT a voluntary choice, half the country opted not to vaccinate. The incidence of SIDS then dropped by 50 percent. The UK also had a reduced number of SIDS when the vaccination became voluntary.

In the United States there are nearly 10,000 SIDS annually, a tremendous increase in the last two decades, an increase which may reflect increased of infants.

In New Zealand, the DTPH3 (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-haemophilus influenza referred to as “The Quad”) is given at 6 weeks after birth, and again at 12 weeks. That NZ cot deaths tend to cluster around the 8 to 16 week mark is proof of nothing; the timing is however suggestive.

As far back as 1974 Dr Robert Riesinger expressed the belief that one of the reasons breast-fed babies fare better is that there is far less E. Coli in the gut and that it is this bacteria which in combination with the DPT vaccine causes endotoxic shock, heart and breathing failures.

In 1982 Dr William Torch of the Nevada School of Medicine reported that 2/3 of 103 children who died of SIDS had been immunised with DPT vaccine up to three weeks before their deaths, most dying within a day of the vaccination.

In 1983 an American study of 145 SIDS victims found that 53 had received DPT immunisations in close proximity to their deaths. The researchers concluded that these findings further substantiate a possible association between DPT shots and SIDS.

In 1994 the US institute of Medicine, looking at the up to 10,000 cases of SIDS per year in that country, admitted that the evidence is consistent for a casual relation between DPT vaccine and acute encephalopathy, encephalitis or encephalomyelitis and unusual shock-like state. This was then reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Dr Archie Kalokerinos MBBS, Ph.D, of Australia noted that after were carried out in the Aboriginal community, up to half of the children went into endotoxic shock and died. He was able to rescue a few near-deaths by administering large does of vitamin C (a detoxifier) into the muscle or veins. He realised that these infants were so malnourished that they could not cope with the impact of the vaccines. So before the procedure he built them up with vitamins, especially Vitamin C, in doses proportionate to their age, and most of them thereafter survived the .

The US Department of Health and Human Services early in 1997 reported that an estimate of 60,000 children per year receiving the DPT vaccine experience convulsions, shock, colic etc.

In 1988, a case brought before the High Court in London revealed 2,081 neurological (nervous system) problems in 80% of those inoculated with whooping cough vaccine 383 while more than 90 cases of autism, or inability to talk, in the UK are considered due to the after effects of vaccination.

In USA, since 1988 $US724.4 million has been awarded to the families of children injured or killed by .

The New Zealand Listener reported another mother’s experience with her fifteen month old healthy child: About an hour after he’d had the vaccine, he became sleepy, and wasn’t able to be woken for 19 hours. He slept for 19 hours solid. The next morning he woke with a high-pitched scream, back arched, body rigid, and screamed for five and a half hours. This formerly healthy child then went on to develop autistic tendencies, allergies, swollen joints, seizures and bizarre behaviour problems that took years to bring under control. His mother sums it up, “I believed in and that’s why we did it. I didn’t want a child brain-damaged or dead, which is what they told us if you don’t vaccinate. And unfortunately I got a child brain-damaged anyway”

Back in 1999 we bought a copy of this brilliant book – “Your Health At Risk” by Dr Toni Jeffreys (PhD), and it was a starting point for much of what we’ve have learned since.

We highly recommend reading the whole book, which although no longer in print, can often be bought second hand on Trade Me.

Vaccination is based on a false premise – Eleanor McBean

The false “germ theory” of disease, upon which vaccination is based, has been the blind leader of the blind that has dragged the medical system and the impressionable public deeper into the morass of confusion and disease.

The nebulous theory of “anti-bodies” is the main prop that holds up the dead corpse of vaccination. In volume 6 of THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM, Dr. Herbert M. Shelton brings into sharper focus this “tricky” subject of anti-bodies. These elusive little nothings have fooled the people and served the uses of the doctors but have vanished into theory when subjected to the clear light of scientific investigation.

Dr. Shelton writes: “The whole of the modern medical practice of vaccine, serum and antitoxin therapy is based upon the supposition that the body manufactures substances called anti-toxins, anti-bodies, antigens, etc., which are capable of meeting and destroying toxins that get into the body.

The idea seems to be sound, although it is possible that the work of destroying such toxins is that of the detoxification carried on by the liver, and lymph glands, etc. Anti-toxins, antibodies, antigens, etc., have never been isolated. They have only been assumed, while the practice based upon their assumed existence has been both a failure and disaster. However, this may not be due to their non-existence. If they exist it is impossible to separate them from the proteins of the animal’s blood (in making vaccines) and these proteins when injected directly into the blood of another animal (or human being) are very poisonous.

Besides this, there is no evidence that the anti-toxins of one species can be made use of by another species. Where vaccines are employed, it constitutes the introduction of actual disease matter into the blood. That is, the supposed causative germs or some product of the disease is introduced into the body. The consequences are often terrible. Real benefits are never observed.

“If the hypothesis that the body manufactures anti-toxins, anti-bodies, etc., is correct it still remains to be proven that the body ever manufactures these greatly in excess of the need for them. It cannot be shown that ‘free’ anti-toxin, anti-bodies, etc., are suspended in the blood serum and can therefore be transferred to another animal in sufficient quantities to be of use to the receiving animal.

In keeping with a general law of life, it is very probable that the body does manufacture an excess of anti-bodies, but it cannot be shown that it retains these after the need for them has ceased. On the contrary, in keeping with another general law of life, it is very probable that the body begins to get rid of them the very instant the need for them ceases. If they exist they are chemical substances produced to meet an emergency and will be cast out as soon as the emergency ceases to exist.”

The renowned Dr. Antoine Bechamp, one of the world’s foremost scientists and bacteriologists, observed that the micro-organisms that are ordinarily called germs, evolve out of decaying cells they helped to build, and take part in the decomposing of the ever changing life substance and help to form it into material usable again by nature. Thus, when germs are found within a sick body it is not that they entered from outside and caused the disease. It is because they developed from the decaying cells within the body and have an important part to play in helping to handle the waste and destruction brought about by serums, drugs and other poisons forced upon the body from without.

Perhaps our modern bacteriologists have seen this activity of the “microzymas” and jumped to the conclusion that they are anti-bodies fighting disease and that they (the doctors) must inject more of them into the body by way of vaccines. But anyone with common sense and reasoning can see that this would only interfere and disrupt the well organized efforts of nature. This is the reason why vaccination has taken such a heavy toll of lives and has produced such widespread disease.

“Nature makes no mistakes and violates no laws. She is uniformly governed by fixed principles and all her actions harmonize with the laws that govern these actions.” (THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM, p. 48 — Shelton —)

“The best, indeed the only, method of promoting individual and public health is to teach people the laws of nature and thus teach them how to preserve their health. Immunization programs are futile and are based on the delusions that the law of cause and effect can be annulled. Vaccines and serums are employed as substitutes for right living; they are intended to supplant obedience to the laws of life. Such programs are slaps in the face of law and order. Belief in immunization is a form of delusional insanity.” (PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL HEALING — p. 478 — Shelton)

Like much other medical information published over 50 years ago, the classic anti-vaccination book “The Poisoned Needle” by Eleanor McBean (1957) reveals many truths long since heavily oppresed by our controlled media and corrupt sickness industry.

It is available free online

The Autism Vaccine Link is well proven

Autism is triggered by the failure to eliminate heavy metals – what heavy metals? – the mercury in vaccines for starters, and the mercury inherited from the parents amalgam fillings too – yes, there is more to it than this, but ignoring these basics is not a good start.

There are many other side effects of vaccination, this is a huge subject, and pro-vaccine people get very angry, and very inaccurate about this subject when it is discussed.

For anyone who has swallowed the propaganda hook, line, and sinker, here is a list of 26 downloads of studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s findings that cause autism:

IS VACCINATION EFFECTIVE?

This chart below shows the levels of six diseases that were prevalent in the past. Often people point to the decline in these diseases and say that they declined because of . But it’s clear that the incidence had drastically reduced before the vaccines were introduced.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield

Dr. Andrew Wakefield was singled out for the wrath of the pharmaceutical industry when his research found the vaccine strain of measles virus in the intestinal tracts of children whose parents reported regressive autism and inflammatory bowel disease after the MMR vaccine.

In the pursuit of the link between childhood vaccines, intestinal inflammation, and neurological injury in children, Dr. Wakefield lost his job, his career, his fellowships and his medical license.

Many other teams and papers have replicated his work; these studies have been peer reviewed and published. Dr. Wakefield is in fact suing the British Medical Journal (which repudiated his published research paper) and the journalist who attacked him most virulently.

His boss and supervisor, prestigious pediatric gastroenterologist Professor John Walker-Smith, who was also stripped of his medical license and accused of the same supposed wrongdoings, sued in the High Court in Britain and was fully exonerated on all charges. The judge severely rebuked the British General Medical Council for its egregious misconduct.

Dr. Wakefield’s findings of a novel form of bowel disease are now so accepted in the scientific community that vaccine makers are attempting to develop a vaccine for bowel disease in kids with autism. There are well over two hundred scientific papers and case reports published in peer reviewed medical journals documenting and exploring vaccine injury and death. See more at www.greatergoodmovie.org

Both the U.S. and Italian governments have since conceded that MMR can cause autism.

Dr. Wakefield is one of the few doctors with the courage to speak the truth.

A Bullet to the Head, The Vaccination Movement – Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

It seems people must observe someone taking a bullet to the head before they believe bullets can be deadly…and then they rue the day they ignored warnings about playing with loaded guns.

Vaccination seems to hold a similar place. People hear stories of side effects and bad reactions from a vaccine, but then proceed to roll up their sleeve and get the shot anyway.

They believe vaccines are good for them, like taking a multivitamin, and equally as benign.

But when serious adverse events occur, such as Guillain-Barre paralysis, an autoimmune disease, a seizure disorder or even death, a jolt of reality lays bare just how damaging a vaccination can be.

The stranglehold of fear, perpetrated by those in white coats, by the media, by bureaucrats in Washington DC and now, by state legislators, who all take their marching orders from pharma, is working overtime to choke rationally thinking adults into submission.

We live in turbulent and aggressive times around the topic of vaccines. Soft language and politely hand holding until people “get it” has become increasingly difficult.

The business of waking people up to the hazards of vaccines certainly has its ups and downs. The recent fiasco with my trip to Australia is a case in point.

Starting out as a planned holiday to the Land Down Under, I was invited by Ms. Stephanie Messenger to speak at a series Holistic Living seminars she was setting up along the east coast of the Continent.

The host cities were to include Melbourne, Sydney, Gold Coast, Adelaide and Brisbane. I anticipated most attendees to be open to non-vaccinating, rather like speaking to the choir. Nonetheless, I looked forward to meeting like-minded Australians, and making some new friends.

In November, I got my visa, my plane ticket, and started to plan the three-week trip, a combination of sightseeing, speaking and a very long plane ride.

Much to my surprise, pandemonium erupted on January 4, 2015 as an outraged pro-vaccine lobby and the Australian Skeptics got wind of the planned speaking events.

The first article, released in the Daily Telegraph, set the tone for the next several weeks as the Australian press chased me down for interviews.

A quick Google search for “Tenpenny, speaking, Australia” will return more than 75,000 hits. Here is a short list of what transpired over the ensuing six weeks:

I was twice beamed in by satellite to the Today Show, Australia (NBC has removed the original segments).

I was labeled an “International public health menace.”

Stories were reported day after day in the Guardian, Global Research, The Sydney Morning Herald and others.

The media twisted and stretched the story with increasingly incorrect information. It was rather like the game, Telephone, when the last person tells a very different story than what the first person said.

A Skype interview with independent journalist, Toby McCasker, about my position on vaccines was published in Vice Magazine Online.

An online petition, asking the Minister of Health to revoke my travel visa, gained nearly 7,500 signatures.

A #StopTenpenny twitter campaign was rolled out by pro-vaccination campaigners.

The New Zealand press got involved, supporting Australian uproar.

The controversy traveled around the world and I was invited by David Icke to be a guest on Richie Allen Show, broadcasting from the UK and across Europe to thousands of listeners.

American independent press picked up the story, including The Activist Post and NaturalNews.com. Other shows, including WHDT TV with Gary Franchi, The Robert Scott Bell Show, The Power Hour with Joyce Riley, CoastToCoastAM with George Noory, InfoWars with Alex Jones, TrueNews with Rick Wiles, Lou Rockwell, and many others, invited me to be their guest.

Personal slurs, including half-baked, liar, quack, dangerous, extremist, and cult leader, were hurled at me and all types of slanderous comments were launched through social media and blogs, targeting anyone who had a similar understanding about problems associated with vaccines.

Many late night, off-line conversations occurred, discussing the threats being levied against local Australian business owners, the seminar hosts and myself. Because I was not the only speaker at these events, and many participants were bringing small children, the remaining venues were cancelled, out of concerns of safety for all.

The Results: More Awareness than Ever – A common question consistently arose through the flurry of interviews: Why are Australia’s public health representatives so opposed to its citizens being exposed to information that clearly demonstrates vaccines are causing harm – information from peer-reviewed journals?

If the material is found to be deceptive and untrue, would it be a threat? Wouldn’t the presentation be tossed off as drivel? Does the rabidly pro-vaccine lobby really believe that Australian parents are so naïve, so vulnerable and so unable to critically think for themselves that an American could mesmerize them into blindly and unconditionally stop vaccinating?

Advocates of pro-vaccine dogma have become extremely brazen because they are afraid of a differing opinion. Warnings of potential bomb threats, campaigns to revoke my visa instead of welcoming a debate? How cowardly. Industry sponsored, corrupted research being passed off at science is being challenged every day.

But why work to improve communication, develop safer products or address the vaccination schedule in light of family history, when you can stifle opposing opinions by being a bully? The actions of a handful of militant, pro-vaccine activists shut down free speech in a country that claims to have such a right.

The nanny state never voiced an opinion, but instead, allowed the rampage to not only block a verbal debate, but block the freedom to hear information not lockstep with a pro-vaccine message.

Oh, public health officials and physicians – here and abroad – claim people have a right to refuse. But as a practical matter, when it comes to challenging vaccine safety and efficacy? It’s ok to ask questions, as long as you don’t disagree – and you continue to vaccinate.

Hand-selected physicians, paraded out by the media as “experts,” do nothing more than regurgitate sound bites crafted by PR firms for WHO and CDC. But their pro-vaccine rhetoric is taking a beating.

The public is waking up to the reality that vaccines can – and do – cause harm. The public is beginning to understand that the “pseudo-science” is really coming from the co-opted medical profession, not from those who seek to expose their pompousness for what it is.

The outcome of this hullabaloo resulted in unintended consequences for the pro-vaccine message, a blowback no one envisioned from a quiet tour/holiday up the eastern coast of Australia. The fanatics defeated themselves.

They made so much noise that everybody heard, everybody. No amount of marketing, advertising, public relations or money could have created this much awareness.

Millions all over the world who never gave the vaccine debate a thought have now awakened. They are rubbing the sand from their indoctrinated eyes, shaking their cobwebs from their foggy brain, starting to do their own research.

Consciousness begins after even a cursory examination of the mounds of readily available evidence: Something is radically wrong with the vaccine schedule, the ingredients, the safety claims, the irrational fear of fever, the overwhelming number of injured children – and adults.

In fact, let me thank the pro-vaccine zealots for drawing so much attention to problems associated with vaccines. At the end of the day, all your commotion resulted in a substantial win for those you disparage as “anti-vaccine.”

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

What About Vaccinations? – by Raymond Francis

Popular opinion regarding goes something like this: Immunizations are one of modern medicine’s greatest achievements; they have prevented more suffering and saved more lives than any other medical procedure.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

In fact, the modern practice of mass may well be the biggest medical blunder of all time.

No reliable safety study has ever been performed on any vaccine, and evidence suggests that they may actually be quite harmful.

Individuals are being forced without informed consent, to risk death or injury, and there is no accountability for the possible negative impacts. The individual is being sacrificed for the “good of society.” Upon examining the literature, it appears vaccinations are both ineffective and dangerous.

A stronger argument for the decline of infectious diseases can be made regarding better sanitation, less crowded living conditions, and increased availability of food. As Pasteur’s germ theory became common knowledge, better sanitation became a part of life and thus infectious transmission dramatically decreased.

As is the case with all disease, the level of immunity is most important. Wider availability of food helped to improve the immunity of the population at large. In addition, diseases tend to have their own evolutionary cycles; they go away as the population gains “herd” immunity.

Diseases like bubonic plague and scarlet fever experienced declines similar to other infectious diseases; they faded away without any immunization programs whatsoever.

Astoundingly, it is difficult to find any studies that prove the effectiveness of vaccines. To prove efficacy, we must analyze studies of vaccinated groups versus unvaccinated ones. Very few of these types of studies have ever been conducted; the few that have, indicate the vaccines are not effective, and are actually harmful.

One study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that the incidence of meningitis in children vaccinated against it was five times higher than in unvaccinated children It is an undisputed fact that tuberculosis vaccines have had absolutely no impact on the incidence of tuberculosis.

Diphtheria vaccination programs have been followed by unprecedented diphtheria epidemics among the vaccinated populations. In Germany during World War II, diphtheria were made mandatory. The Germans experienced an immediate 17% increase in diphtheria cases and a 600% increase in mortality. At the end of the war, the were stopped. There was an immediate and dramatic decline in the number of cases, despite widespread malnutrition and poor living conditions.

In the U.S. , it is officially accepted that, since it’s inception, the polio vaccine has caused all cases of polio. Dr. Vera Schreibner, a world authority on immunizations and author of Vaccinations, had this to say: “Immunizations…not only did not prevent any infectious diseases, they caused more suffering and more deaths than any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention.”

Having assembled the world’s largest collection of data on immunizations, Dr. Schreibner concludes: “One hundred years of orthodox research shows that vaccines represent a medical assault on the immune system.” Research by Dr. Schreibner and others continues to unveil the alarming truth about ; here are some further examples: Pertussis have been followed by cases of “provocation polio.” This kind of polio is well known to follow almost any vaccination, but especially pertussis and polio .

Measles is another case in point. Measles constantly occurs in vaccinated populations. In fact, there is even a new and especially vicious form of measles called ‘atypical measles.’ It affects only vaccinated populations and is apparently the result of a deranged immunological response caused by the vaccine.

New data reports sharp rises in diabetes among children vaccinated for meningitis. A recent article in Newsweek attributed the AIDS epidemic to oral polio vaccine given between 1957 and 1960. A growing number of researchers are now attributing the epidemics of childhood cancer, leukemia, asthma, autoimmune disease, cerebral palsy, infantile convulsions, and sudden infant death syndrome to vaccinations.

Each generation is experiencing more immune dystoreunction diseases as a result. Dr. Terry Phillips, Professor of Medicine at George Washington University Medical Center , reported at an international conference in 1997 that the foreign proteins in virtually all vaccines wreck havoc with the human immune system.

Vaccines alter the body’s immune response and do permanent damage. Why? Vaccines are loaded with all kinds of garbage that should never be injected into a human body. They are contaminated with animal viruses (monkeys, calves, and chickens) from which the vaccines are made. These viruses put a permanent antigenic burden on our immune systems.

Some researchers believe that these persistent circulating antigens do continuing damage to both the immune and nervous systems, causing immune suppression and dystoreunction, such as autoimmune disease. Vaccines also contain formaldehyde, aluminum, mercury, and a large assortment of foreign proteins, all of which are not good for you.

Dr. Harris Coulter in his book, The Assault on the American Child, says that the allergic response initiated when a vaccine is injected into the body is capable of causing encephalitis (an inflammation of the brain). Encephalitis can cause permanent brain damage leading to lifetime problems with autism, dyslexia, learning disabilities, behavioural disorders, and antisocial syndromes. Dr. Coulter estimates that 50% of the children who experience a fever after vaccination are actually suffering from encephalitis, which is doing various degrees of permanent brain damage. Coulter blames vaccines for the “new morbidity” of learning and behaviour disorders.

There is a definite association between vaccines, learning disorders and other modern brain dystoreunctions. The immediate effects of can include convulsions, fevers, and allergic reactions, which are known to produce mental retardation, learning disabilities, paralysis, and epilepsy.

Yet, there still are no long-term studies on the safety of vaccines. The studies often cited for vaccine safety are short term, often limited to only two days after injection. No studies have been done comparing cognitive or developmental function in vaccinated children versus unvaccinated. Sadly, we know little of what happens in the body during a vaccination; our knowledge of the long-term effects is almost nonexistent.

Raymond Francis – beyondhealth.com

Fordham University mumps outbreak

The Fordham University mumps outbreak in February 2014 affected only vaccinated students, but they banned unvaccinated students anyway

Vaccines don’t work, admitted Fordham University, but you must have them to attend classes

Fordham University made headlines in February 2014, after 13 confirmed cases of mumps emerged on two of its campuses, prompting school officials to ban all unvaccinated students from attending classes.

But these same reports clearly indicated that all affected students had already been vaccinated for mumps, proving once again the utter uselessness of vaccines and the mindless tendencies of organizations following vaccine dogma.

Concerns first arose after several Fordham University students suddenly came down with flu-like symptoms, which later turned out to be adult mumps in every case. The infection numbers continued to increase, prompting an inquiry into the vaccination records of the affected students. But this inquiry revealed that not a single unvaccinated student had contracted the mumps — only those who had previously been vaccinated for mumps developed the disease.

Nevertheless, Fordham officials decided to prohibit all unvaccinated students, none of whom contracted the disease, from attending classes unless they agreed to provide proof of vaccination. At the same time, all the vaccinated students who contracted mumps were allowed to continue attending classes after exceeding the supposed contagious stage.

“All of the students who were tentatively diagnosed with mumps had been vaccinated,” ABC News reported. “Vaccinations do not offer 100 percent protection.”

IS THERE A BETTER WAY?

There are many better ways to improve immunity including:

Eating real food, and avoiding processed food. The Amish are a good example of this.

Exposing children in an organic way to the challenges of the world including dirt and animals.

FOLLOW THE MONEY

Some of the funding for the vaccine agenda is provided by:

David Rockefeller

The Rockefeller Foundation Funds Anti-Fertility Vaccines

The Rockefeller Foundation has funded numerous research projects into the development “anti-fertility” vaccines, with their research dating back to at least 1968, and continuing until at least 1988. There now exists several methods to sterilize both men and women by injection, as well as to terminate pregnancies and/or induce spontaneous abortions.

Bill Gates

Bill Gates is a eugenicist with ties to Monsanto and the Bilderburg group. He has retired from leading Microsoft and now focuses his money and time on furthering genetically modified technology, geoengineering, experimental , investing in McDonalds, and preaching about how Monsanto is the answer to world hunger. He owns 500,000 shares in Monsanto, and in this recent photo below he is aged 57, so he clearly knows a few health secrets.

He has been quite open about connecting the use of vaccines, GMOs, health care and reducing the population through a mostly covert eugenics programme. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has formally tied its agenda to the aims of the Rockefeller Foundation, including funding for and population reduction.

That Bill Gates is in favour of human depopulation is not in dispute, since his appearance at a billionaire’s conference in 2009 where he concluded that overpopulation was the greatest threat to humanity and old people should be killed in order for teachers to keep their jobs.

After the scandal of a WHO-administered tetanus vaccine in the 1990s that was found to cause spontaneous abortions in the women who received them, and after a polio vaccination campaign in Nigeria caused a vaccine-induced surge in polio, third world populations have been rejecting the “benevolent” vaccines of rich eugenicist monopolists in large numbers.

So concerned is Gates and his foundation with making sure that third world populations get their vaccines, they began awarding funds to Japanese scientists in 2008 to engineer vaccines into mosquitoes that could then be released to deliver injections through their bites.

Jacob Rothchild

The head of the Rothchild dynasty, long regarded as the most powerful and evil family in human history. They are claimed to pretty much own and run the entire world, and are also said to use vaccinations as part of their depopulation agenda.

It is alleged that the Rothschilds control the international media through ownership of Reuters, Associated Press and many other media interests, along with Hollywood through ownership of Viacom, Disney and other groups, and they exercise social and political control through the many thousands of think-tanks, so-called ‘human rights’ organisations and community organisations they either started or fund from the UN, Trilateral commission, CFR, and Bilderberg Group.

It is also alleged that they own and control nearly all the world’s central banks, and that they control of all major Western political parties and parliaments, reserving the final say above all parliaments.

This is quite a claim, and it’s essentially a Catch 22 situation. If it’s true, they would be able to block all evidence of it. And equally, if it’s not true, people who believe what the media tells them (“skeptics”), would be unable to prove it’s not true either. Although these so called “skeptics” are often very quick to claim it has been proven false.

It appears that many things are funded and controlled at the highest levels by the Rothchilds, certainly including .

One thing is clear though – Mr Burns of The Simpsons bears a remarkable resemblence to Jacob Rothschild…

HOW MANY OF THESE VACCINATION FACTS DO YOU KNOW?

by Jon Rappoport

The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition.” (Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977)

In a recent British outbreak of whooping cough, fully immunized children contracted the disease in fairly large numbers; and the rates of serious complications and death were reduced only slightly. In another recent outbreak of pertussis, 46 of the 85 fully immunized children studied eventually contracted the disease.” (Richard Moskowitz, MD, The Case Against Immunizations, 1983, American Institute of Homeopathy)

In 1977, 34 new cases of measles were reported on the campus of UCLA, in a population that was supposedly 91% immune, according to careful serological testing. Another 20 cases of measles were reported in the Pecos, New Mexico, area within a period of a few months in 1981, and 75% of them had been fully immunized, some of them quite recently. A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunized urban community revealed that about 15% of this age group are still susceptible to rubella, a figure essentially identical with that of the pre-vaccine era. (Moskowitz, The Case Against Immunizations)

Of all reported whooping cough cases between 1979 and 1984 in children over 7 months of age – that is, old enough to have received the primary course of the DPT shots (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus) – 41% occurred in children who had received three or more shots and 22% in children who had one or two immunizations.

Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more.” [Note: All these symptoms can indicate serious neurological damage.] (Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987)

A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT , and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used).” (Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987.)

Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America’s children every year.” (DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich)

While 70-80% of British children were immunized against pertussis in 1970-71, the rate is now 39%. The committee predicts that the next pertussis epidemic will probably turn out to be more severe than the one in 1974/75. However, they do not explain why, in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities.” (Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370)

Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored.” (Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217)

Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children.” (Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 58)

Pertussis (whooping cough) immunization is controversial, as the side effects have received a great deal of publicity. The counter claim is that the effectiveness and protection offered by the procedure far outweigh the possible ill effects… annual deaths, per million children, from this disease over the period from 1900 to the mid-nineteen seventies, shows that from a high point of just under 900 deaths per million children (under age 15) in 1905, the decline has been consistent and dramatic. There had been a lowering of mortality rates of approximately 80% by the time immunization was introduced on a mass scale, in the mid-nineteen fifties. The decline has continued, albeit at a slower rate, ever since. No credit can be given to vaccination for the major part of the decline since it was not in use.” (Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 63)

The swine-flu vaccination program was one of its (CDC’s) greatest blunders. It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix, N.J., was similar to the swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918. Health officials immediately launched a 100-million dollar program to immunize every American. But the expected epidemic never materialized, and the vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people. There were 32 deaths.” (U.S. News and World Report, Joseph Carey, October 14, 1985, p. 70, “How Medical Sleuths Track Killer Diseases”)

Despite (cases) in which (smallpox) vaccination plainly failed to protect the population, and despite the rampant side-effects of the methods, the proponents of vaccination continued their attempts to justify the methods by claims that the disease had declined in Europe as a whole during the period of its compulsory use. If the decline could be correlated with the use of the vaccination, then all else could be set aside, and the advantage between its current low incidence could be shown to outweigh the periodic failures of the method, and to favour the continued use of vaccination. However, the credit for the decline in the incidence of smallpox could not be given to vaccination. The fact is that its incidence declined in all parts of Europe, whether or not vaccination was employed.” (Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, pp. 6-7)

Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after extensive vaccination).” (W. Scott Webb, A Century of Vaccination, Swan Sonnenschein, 1898)

In this incident (Kyoto, Japan, 1948) – the most serious of its kind – a toxic (vaccine) batch of alum-precipitated toxoid (APT) was responsible for illness in over 600 infants and for no fewer than 68 deaths.

On 20 and 22 October, 1948, a large number of babies and children in the city of Kyoto received their first injection of APT. On the 4th and 5th of November, 15,561 babies and children aged some months to 13 years received their second dose. One to two days later, 606 of those who had been injected fell ill. Of these, 9 died of acute diphtheritic paralysis in seven to fourteen days, and 59 of late paralysis mainly in four to seven weeks.” (Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization, Athone Press, University of London, 1967)

Accidents may, however, follow the use of this so-called killed (rabies) vaccine owing to inadequate processing. A very serious occurrence of this sort occurred at Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, in 1960. No fewer than 18 out of 66 persons vaccinated with Fermi’s carbolized (rabies) vaccine suffered from encephalomyelitis and every one of the eighteen died.” (Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization)

At a press conference in Washington on 24 July, 1942, the Secretary of War reported that 28,585 cases of jaundice had been observed in the (American) Army between 1 January and 4 July after yellow fever vaccination, and of these 62 proved fatal.” ( Wilson, Hazards of Immunization)

The world’s biggest trial (conducted in south India) to assess the value of BCG tuberculosis vaccine has made the startling revelation that the vaccine ‘does not give any protection against bacillary forms of tuberculosis.’ The study said to be ‘most exhaustive and meticulous,’ was launched in 1968 by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) with assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia.

The incidence of new cases among the BCG vaccinated group was slightly (but statistically insignificantly) higher than in the control group, a finding that led to the conclusion that BCG’s protective effect ‘was zero.’” (New Scientist, November 15, 1979, as quoted by Hans Ruesch in Naked Empress, Civis Publishers, Switzerland, 1982)

Between 10 December 1929 and 30 April 1930, 251 of 412 infants born in Lubeck received three doses of BCG vaccine by the mouth during the first ten days of life. Of these 251, 72 died of tuberculosis, most of them in two to five months and all but one before the end of the first year. In addition, 135 suffered from clinical tuberculosis but eventually recovered; and 44 became tuberculin-positive but remained well. None of the 161 unvaccinated infants born at the time was affected in this way and none of these died of tuberculosis within the following three years.” (Hazards of Immunization, Wilson)

We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of the 14-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine in 2295 high-risk patients… Seventy-one episodes of proved or probable pneumococcal pneumonia or bronchitis occurred among 63 of the patients (27 placebo recipients and 36 vaccine recipients)… We were unable to demonstrate any efficacy of the pneumococcal vaccine in preventing pneumonia or bronchitis in this population.” ( New England Journal of Medicine, November 20, 1986, p. 1318, Michael Simberkoff et al.

But already before Salk developed his vaccine, polio had been constantly regressing; the 39 cases out of every 100,000 inhabitants registered in 1942 had gradually diminished from year to year until they were reduced to only 15 cases in 1952… according to M. Beddow Baylay, the English surgeon and medical historian.” (Slaughter of the Innocent, Hans Reusch, Civitas Publish ers, Switzerland, and Swain, New York, 1983)

Many published stories and reports have stated, implied and otherwise led professional people and the public to believe that the sharp reduction of cases (and of deaths) from poliomyelitis in 1955 as compared to 1954 is attributable to the Salk vaccine… That it is a misconception follows from these considerations. The number of children inoculated has been too small to account for the decrease. The sharp decrease was apparent before the inoculations began or could take effect and was of the same order as the decrease following the immediate post-inoculation period.” (Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, vol. 20, no. 1, 1987)

So far it is hardly possible to gain insight into the extent of the immunization catastrophe of 1955 in the United States. It may be considered certain that the officially ascertained 200 cases (of polio) which were caused directly or indirectly by the (polio) vaccination constitute minimum figures… It can hardly be estimated how many of the 1359 (polio) cases among vaccinated persons must be regarded as failures of the vaccine and how many of them were infected by the vaccine. A careful study of the epidemiologic course of polio in the United States yields indications of grave significance. In numerous states of the U.S.A., typical early epidemics developed with the immunizations in the spring of 1955… The vaccination incidents of the year 1955 cannot be exclusively traced back to the failure of one manufacturing firm.” (Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980, vol. 19, no. 4, “Story of the Salk Vaccine,” Part 2)

Suffice it to say that most of the large (polio) epidemics that have occurred in this country since the introduction of the Salk vaccine have followed the wide-scale use of the vaccine and have been characterized by an uncommon early seasonal onset. To name a few, there is the Massachusetts epidemic of 1955; the Chicago epidemic of 1956; and the Des Moines epidemic of 1959.” (Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980 vol. 19, no. 4)

The live (Sabin) poliovirus vaccine has been the predominant cause of domestically arising cases of paralytic poliomyelitis in the United States since 1972. To avoid the occurrence of such cases, it would be necessary to discontinue the routine use of live poliovirus vaccine.” (Jonas Salk, Science, March 4, 1977, p. 845)

By the ( U.S.) government’s own admission, there has been a 41% failure rate in persons who were previously vaccinated against the (measles) virus.” [In other words, these persons were vaccinated and then contracted measles.] (Dr. Anthony Morris, John Chriss, BG Young, “Occurrence of Measles in Previously Vaccinated Individuals,” 1979; presented at a meeting of the American Society for Microbiology at Fort Detrick, Maryland, April 27, 1979)

Prior to the time doctors began giving rubella (German Measles) , an estimated 85% of adults were naturally immune to the disease (for life). Because of immunization, the vast majority of women never acquire natural immunity (or lifetime protection).” (Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, Let’s Live, December 1983, as quoted by Carolyn Reuben in the LA WEEKLY, June 28, 1985)

Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” (JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such falsely protected children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… “)

How many of these vaccine facts do you know?